Course design project / 14Earlier project

Fidget Spinner
Design

A mechanical-design course project that followed a small product from CAD and tolerancing through analysis, mold planning, CNC planning, and assembly thinking.

Status / dateEarlier project
RoleMechanical designer
DisciplineCourse design project
MethodsCAD · GD&T · FEA · CAM

PROJECT AT A GLANCE

Product realization chain

The spinner is small, but it touches the complete mechanical workflow: functional requirements become geometry, geometry becomes manufacturing information, and manufactured parts must assemble and perform.

How a CAD model becomes a manufacturable assembly.Read left → right
01Fit + balance needsDefine functional targets
02CAD + GD&TControl critical geometry
03FEA + manufacturingCheck loads and processes
04Assemble + testInspect fit and behavior
How to read itEach stage translates intent for the next one. A perfect-looking model is incomplete until its tolerances, process, and inspection path are understandable.

01 / Context

Why this project exists

The fidget spinner's small scale made it a useful vehicle for practicing an unusually broad engineering workflow. Its geometry had to hold bearings, rotate freely, feel balanced, and remain manufacturable.

Rather than stopping at a model, the project connected nominal CAD geometry to GD&T, finite-element analysis, mold considerations, CNC planning, and final assembly.

02 / Approach

How the problem was framed

CAD defined the part and its interfaces, while tolerancing translated functional needs into allowable variation. Bearing fits and symmetry are especially important because small errors can affect assembly and perceived rotation.

FEA provided a structured way to examine loading assumptions, but it had to be interpreted alongside manufacturing. Mold direction, tool access, stock, setups, and assembly sequence constrain geometry differently, revealing why a design cannot be optimized in only one environment.

03 / Result

What exists now

The result was a course-level design package and an end-to-end view of product realization. It is presented as a learning project, not a commercially manufactured product.

The project’s strength is breadth: one familiar object exposed the chain from design intent to drawing communication, analysis assumptions, process planning, and assembly.

04 / Reflection

Lessons and next steps

A precise CAD model is only the beginning. Functional dimensions, datum strategy, tool access, process capability, and inspection determine whether another person can make the intended object.

A next iteration would define measurable spin and durability targets, build prototypes from competing processes, inspect critical features, and compare test results with the analysis assumptions.

  • Scope and claims are limited to what the surviving project record supports.
  • Future updates will add verified media, measurements, and milestones as they become available.