Hackathon prototype / 11Team project


Kasli

A workout application developed with friends during a hackathon, where a limited build window forced the team to choose a focused user flow and execute quickly.

Status / dateTeam project
RoleTeam contributor
DisciplineHackathon prototype
MethodsApp design · rapid prototyping

PROJECT AT A GLANCE

Hackathon delivery path

A short build window forces the team to identify one useful workout flow, divide it into compatible pieces, and reserve enough time to combine and demonstrate them.

How a broad workout idea becomes a focused demo.Read left → right
01One user problemChoose the core workout need
02Shortest complete flowCut nonessential features
03Parallel team workUse shared interfaces
04Coherent prototypeTest and demonstrate early
How to read itThe visualization narrows on purpose: a thin end-to-end experience communicates more than a large collection of disconnected screens.

01 / Context

Why this project exists

Kasli explored how a digital product could support workout planning or tracking. The hackathon format made scope the central design constraint: the team needed a concept that could be demonstrated coherently within a short period.

The project combined product decisions and implementation under time pressure. Every feature competed for the same limited attention, so the team had to distinguish the core experience from attractive extras.

02 / Approach

How the problem was framed

The work began by establishing the shortest end-to-end path a user should be able to complete. Tasks could then be split between teammates while maintaining shared assumptions about data, navigation, and the demo.

Rapid prototyping favors simple components and known patterns. The goal was not to design an entire fitness platform, but to create enough of the intended workflow to test the idea and communicate it.

03 / Result

What exists now

Kasli remained a team prototype rather than a maintained public product. The surviving portfolio record is limited, so specific features and outcomes are not overstated here.

As an experience, it demonstrated how quickly team communication, scope control, and integration become the determining factors in a short build.

04 / Reflection

Lessons and next steps

Hackathons reward a thin complete path more than many disconnected screens. A demonstration also needs time for integration and recovery from failures, not just feature construction.

A future version would start with user interviews, choose one measurable workout problem, define a minimal data model, and validate that core loop before expanding.

  • Scope and claims are limited to what the surviving project record supports.
  • Future updates will add verified media, measurements, and milestones as they become available.